Vaccine Exemptions


All states have vaccination exemption policies. Often the law is on your state’s web site. You can also contact the state health department to find out the legal exemption requirements. Some states have prescribed forms you must use for exemptions; other states allow you to write your own. If there is no state mandated form, you should word your exemption exactly according to the law in your state.

Every state has medical exemptions. Every state, except West Virginia and Mississippi, has a religious exemption. Eighteen states currently have philosophical exemptions. The military has both medical and religious exemptions
, A table with all the state vaccine exemptions listed and linked is http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx

The US Supreme Court has upheld the right of parents to refuse to vaccinate their children on religious grounds. It has not upheld philosophical exemptions. However, the rulings from the Supreme Court also should protect the rights of parents who choose a philosophical exemption.

Several states require that parents must belong to an organized religious group in order to claim a religious exemption. The US Supreme Court has ruled this requirement unconstitutional. Religious exemptions are available to people who have personal religious beliefs against immunizations. Additionally, the right to claim a religious exemption is available to those who are members of traditional religious groups but have their own understanding of what is required of them as a member of that religious group.

The following information wass posted on the Informed Parents Vaccination Home Page and explained several of the US Supreme Court rulings.

Our legal rights are guaranteed by the free exercise clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. States can only go against this if they can prove a compelling state interest is at stake. But recent court decisions have upheld the rights of individuals seeking exemptions from immunizations based upon "personal" religious beliefs. (Sherr and Levy vs. Northport East-Northport Union Free School District, 672 F. Supp. 81, (E.D.N.Y., 1987); (Allanson vs. Clinton Central School District, U.S.. District Court, Northern District Court, Northern District of New York (84 CV 174), 1984; Campain vs. Marlboro Central School District, Supreme Court Ulster County Special Term, Nov. 15, 1985; Brown vs. City School District, 429 NYS2d 355; Maier vs. Besser, 73 Misc.2d 241).
On the U.S. Supreme Court level in Frazee v. Illinois Dept. of Security, 489 U.S. 829, 1989, it was found that a state may not deny an exemption simply because a person is not a member of a formal religious organization. In addition, the Supreme Court has noted that nontraditional beliefs, including secular humanism, atheism, and nontheistic faiths, are all "religion" for the purpose of free exercise analysis. The Supreme Court in Fowler v. Rhode Island, 345 U.S. 67 (1953) held that it was "no business of the courts to say what is a religious practice or activity for one group is not religion under the protection of the First Amendment."

If you aren’t sure whether or not you qualify for a religious or philosophical exemption, you can access the Religious and Philosophical Exemption Worksheet for help in making your determination.

Please Note: When the CDC and Homeland Security declared H1N1 a National Public Health Emergency, they opened the door for enforcement of the provision that declares all exemptions may be waved in the event pandemic conditions are declared. This means that no medical condition, religious or philosophical conviction, or other situation will have to be honored.

Vaccine Exemption and Military Service

AT one point in time, one of my sons had a desire to join a branch of the military. He has had a religious exemption for immunizations for many years and we had talked several times about what he planned to do about vaccines if he joined the Army.
I have spoken to many veterans who all assured me that once you joined the military you were at the mercy of Uncle Sam regarding vaccines. News stories that came following the initiation of the anthrax vaccine gave some credence to that theory, but I was relatively sure that there must be some waivers given, at least for medical reasons, if not for religious reasons.
Thankfully, I ran across an article on Dr. Mercola's site that answered the question with some real information. I was not surprised to find out that these vets had not been given the whole story. My son's trip to his recruiter confirmed the information as correct, although he did say that most people were not aware of the religious exemption option and that military recruiters were not giving the information out to new recruits.

Signing Up for a Religious Waiver in the Military
There is a one-time window to express and receive a waiver of vaccines. The military applicant must express his or her objections when signing up or enlisting. The applicant must state their objection as either medical or religious conscience. Once stated, they will be given the appropriate paperwork to document the waiver. If the applicant does not express the objection at this time, they have given the military the right to vaccinate with whatever they desire.
If your waiver is refused at the time of enlistment, you should refuse to sign and take the matter up with the recruiter's supervisor. Do not let the recruiter convince you that there are no waivers for military personnel.

For Current Service Members
In 2005, Congress upheld the refusal of some military personnel regarding the anthrax vaccine. This refusal did not apply to any other vaccine. Some military personnel were court-matialed, demoted in rank, fined, and otherwise disciplined for their refusal.
As more and more people are looking into the vaccine issue, I am sure there will be other challenges to the military vaccine policies. I salute those courageous men and women who stood up for their rights and were willing to suffer the consequences. I also salute those in Congress and elsewhere who helped publicize the problem and win a victory for those who refused.
In Oct. 2004, Judge Sullivan issued an injunction against the use of the anthrax vaccine on our military personnel. His injunction was issued because there was no true informed consent and because the claim that the vaccine was safe and effective for use as claimed had not been proved. Thankfully, his courage to take a stand may made a difference for those who were still under charges for refusing to obey an order andsaw rank and pay returned.
Policies will never change if no one challenges them. Challenges to authority never come without a price. Perhaps those willing to lead the challenge may eventually do away with mandatory vaccines to those service men and women who don't have waivers.

Contact Information:
Kathy Barr, CCD, CCCE, CCM, BE, PE, CVE, Traditional Naturopath
817-819-8457


Pasted Graphic 1